In the architecture of executive benefits and business continuity, **Corporate-Owned Life Insurance (COLI)** is a ubiquitous tool. It funds Buy-Sell agreements, backs Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation (NQDC) plans, and serves as a key asset on corporate balance sheets. However, following the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the tax-favored status of COLI is no longer automatic. **IRC Section 101(j)** introduced a strict regime requiring **Notice and Consent** for all employer-owned life insurance contracts. Failure to comply with this administrative step is fatal: it strips the policy of its tax-free death benefit status, converting the proceeds into fully taxable ordinary income. For corporate fiduciaries and HR directors, understanding the mechanics of 101(j) and the accounting implications of COLI is mandatory to prevent a multimillion-dollar tax liability.
I. The Statutory Guillotine: IRC Section 101(j)
Historically, corporations could insure the lives of any employee, leading to the “Janitor Insurance” scandals where companies profited from the deaths of rank-and-file workers. Congress responded with Section 101(j).
1. The General Rule of Taxation
The default rule under Section 101(j)(1) is severe: In the case of an employer-owned life insurance contract, the amount excluded from gross income (the tax-free death benefit) **shall not exceed** the sum of the premiums and other amounts paid by the policyholder for the contract.
Translation: If a company pays $\$100,000$ in premiums for a $\$2,000,000$ policy and the employee dies, the first $\$100,000$ is tax-free (return of basis). The remaining **$\$1,900,000$ is fully taxable ordinary income**. This effectively destroys the economic value of the insurance.
2. The Requirement for Exemption
To retain the tax-free status (i.e., to get the full $\$2,000,000$ tax-free), the employer must meet **two** conditions:
1. Satisfy the **Notice and Consent** requirements (Section 101(j)(4)).
2. Fit into a specific **Employee Status Exception** (Section 101(j)(2)).
II. The “Holy Grail” of Compliance: Notice and Consent
The Notice and Consent requirements are strictly procedural but unforgiving on timing.
1. The Timing Mandate
The Notice and Consent must be executed **before** the issuance of the policy.
The Trap: If the policy is issued on Monday, and the employee signs the consent form on Tuesday, the policy is forever tainted. There is virtually no mechanism to fix this retroactively (“un-ring the bell”). The only solution is to surrender the policy and start over, incurring new acquisition costs and surrender charges.
2. The Content of the Notice
The employee must sign a written document that discloses three specific facts:
1. The employer intends to insure the employee’s life.
2. The maximum applicable face amount (Death Benefit) for which the employee could be insured.
3. The employer (not the employee’s family) will be the beneficiary of the death proceeds.
Fiduciary Best Practice: Never rely on the insurance carrier’s standard application to satisfy this. Use a standalone “101(j) Consent Form” drafted by legal counsel to ensure all disclosures are explicit.
III. The Eligible Insureds: Exceptions to the Rule
Even with Notice and Consent, the insured must fall into a qualified category for the company to own the policy.
1. Directors and Highly Compensated Employees
The most common exception applies if the insured is, at the time the contract is issued:
- A **Director** of the corporation.
- A **Highly Compensated Employee** (defined broadly as the top 35% of employees ranked by pay).
- A **Highly Compensated Individual** (earning above a specific inflation-adjusted threshold, e.g., $\$155,000+$).
This exception effectively bans “Janitor Insurance” while allowing COLI for key executives and management.
2. The “Recent Employee” Exception
The death benefit is also tax-free if the insured was an employee at any time during the 12-month period before the insured’s death. This protects companies that hold policies on recently departed executives.
IV. The Golden Handcuffs: Funding SERPs and NQDC
COLI is the primary funding vehicle for **Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs)** and **Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation (NQDC)**. These plans promise to pay executives additional income at retirement to bypass 401(k) limits.
1. The Funding Mismatch
When a company promises to pay an executive $\$100,000$/year for 10 years starting at age 65, it creates a massive liability on the corporate balance sheet.
The COLI Solution: The company buys a policy on the executive’s life. The cash value growth (tax-deferred) is booked as an asset to offset the accruing liability. When the executive retires, the company can withdraw from the cash value or borrow against it to pay the benefits. When the executive dies, the company recovers its costs via the death benefit.
2. The Rabbi Trust Structure
To provide the executive with security that the company won’t renege on the promise (e.g., in a hostile takeover), the COLI policy is often placed in a **Rabbi Trust**.
The Trade-Off: Assets in a Rabbi Trust are protected from the *whim* of management (Change of Control) but are **NOT protected from bankruptcy creditors**. If the company goes bankrupt, the COLI policy is seized to pay general creditors, and the executive becomes an unsecured creditor. This “risk of forfeiture” is required to prevent the executive from being taxed immediately on the benefit.
V. Corporate Accounting: E&P and AMT Impact
Owning life insurance impacts the corporation’s financial statements and tax returns in nuanced ways, particularly for C-Corporations.
1. Earnings and Profits (E&P)
While life insurance death benefits are generally free from *income tax*, they do increase a C-Corp’s **Earnings and Profits (E&P)**.
Consequence: If a C-Corp receives a $\$5$ million tax-free death benefit, its E&P increases by $\$5$ million. If the corporation then distributes this cash to shareholders, the distribution is treated as a **Taxable Dividend** (to the extent of E&P), not a return of capital. Thus, the “tax-free” nature is effectively lost upon distribution to shareholders.
2. Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (CAMT)
For very large corporations (subject to the new CAMT rules under the Inflation Reduction Act), the “Book Income” adjustment can inadvertently capture life insurance cash value growth or death benefits, imposing a $15\%$ minimum tax. Small and mid-sized businesses are generally exempt, but CFOs of large entities must model this exposure.
3. Deductibility of Premiums
A fundamental rule (IRC Section 264(a)(1)) is that premiums paid on a policy where the corporation is a beneficiary are **NOT tax-deductible**.
The Logic: Since the payout (death benefit) is tax-free, the cost (premium) cannot be deductible. This matching principle prevents a double tax benefit.
VI. Form 8925: The Annual Report Card
Compliance with 101(j) is not a one-time event; it is an annual reporting obligation.
1. The Filing Requirement
Every policyholder owning one or more employer-owned life insurance contracts must file **IRS Form 8925** with their annual income tax return.
This form requires the disclosure of:
- Total number of employees.
- Number of employees insured.
- Total face amount of insurance.
- **Confirmation that valid consent has been obtained.**
The Audit Risk: Failure to file Form 8925 is a red flag that can trigger an IRS audit of the company’s entire insurance portfolio. If an audit reveals missing consent forms, the Service will disallow the tax-free treatment of any death benefits received.
VII. Conclusion: Administrative Discipline is Key
Corporate-Owned Life Insurance is a powerful financial instrument that acts as a hedge against the loss of key talent and a funding source for executive promises. However, the days of casual implementation are over. The difference between a savvy financial move and a catastrophic tax bill lies entirely in the **Notice and Consent** process. Fiduciaries must ensure that no application is signed, and no medical exam is taken, until the 101(j) paperwork is executed and archived. In the world of COLI, the paperwork is as valuable as the policy itself.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or accounting advice. IRC Section 101(j) compliance is strict; corporations should consult with legal counsel and tax advisors to draft proper consent forms and ensure annual Form 8925 filing.